Sunday, July 31, 2005

Brief Summary of Evidence Demonstrating that the Administration Orchestrated 9-11

This article has been superseded by 911Proof.com. Click on the banner below.





14 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index774.htm
This was posted on the whatdoesitmean.com website...I believe, this from Russian intelligence. It connects to your theory.

10:20 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What Really Happened on 9/11?
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/forum/thread8820.html
More info here

10:34 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9/11 – US Complicity: Implausible, or Very Probable?
Questions for the People Who Believe the Official Conspiracy Theory

http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/9_11_-_us_complicity__implausi.html

11:03 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The PBS documentary talks about WTC 7 not 6.

12:36 PM  
Blogger Washingtons Blog said...

In response to the Anonymous


post "The PBS documentary talks about WTC 7 not 6" -- the first PBS link refers to 7; but the second PBS link refers to 6 (starting at about 14 seconds in).

12:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hustler Magazine has the goods on 9/11. http://www.rense.com/general66/dirt.htm

5:33 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i read this some time ago but the link doesnt work now. sorry for copying and pasting the whole article here.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1896&u=/nm/20041215/us_nm/life_conspiracy_dc&printer=1

Sept. 11 Conspiracy Theorist Offers $100,000 Prize


Wed Dec 15, 5:44 PM

ETBy Larry Fine



NEW YORK (Reuters) - Jimmy Walter has spent more than $3 million promoting a conspiracy theory the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States were "an inside job" and he is offering more cash to anyone who proves him wrong.



The millionaire activist is so convinced of a government cover-up he is offering a $100,000 reward to any engineering student who can prove the World Trade Center buildings crashed the way the government says.


"Of course, we expect no winners," Walter, 57, heir to an $11 million fortune from his father's home-building business, said in a telephone interview from California on Wednesday. He accuses figures in government, the military and business of involvement in the Sept. 11 attacks.


Walter said a panel of expert engineers would judge submissions from the students.


Next month, he also launches a nationwide contest seeking alternative theories from college and high school students about why New York's World Trade Center collapsed. The contest offers $10,000 to the best alternative theory, with 100 runner-up awards of $1,000. Winners will be chosen next June.

The World Trade Center's twin towers were destroyed after hijackers from Osama bin Laden 's al Qaeda militant group slammed two commercial airliners into them. The attack in New York killed 2,749 people.


Various official investigations give no credence to Walter's theory. A Sept. 11 commission spokesman said its policy was not to comment on criticism of the report.


Walter insists there had to be explosives planted in the twin towers to cause them to fall as they did, and also rejects the official explanation for the damage done at the Pentagon.


"We have all the proof," said Walter, citing videotapes and testimony from witnesses.


"It wasn't 19 screw-ups from Saudi Arabia who couldn't pass flight school who defeated the United States with a set of box cutters," he said. He dismissed the official Sept. 11 commission report, saying, "I don't trust any of these 'facts."'


Walter has spent millions of dollars to bolster support for his case, running full-page ads in The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, The New Yorker and Newsweek, as well as alternative newspapers and 30-second TV spots.


He points to a Zogby poll he commissioned last summer that showed 66 percent of New Yorkers wanted the 9/11 investigation reopened.


Walter has spent about 30 percent of his net worth on his efforts.


"I am a patriot fighting the real traitors who are destroying our democracy. I resent it when they call me delusional," he said.

4:39 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Keep in mind that some of the behavior exhibited by authorities is consistent with expected national security protocols. Take the following three occasions, for example:

- "Pulling" of the WTC buildings may indeed have been intentional, but deemed as necessary to avoid the impending tipping over of the building... which may have been seen in someone's view as likely to imminent, with a greatly increased anticipated loss of life. So the person(s) may have weighed the likelihood of collapse and potential risk against known loss (believed most had exited the building).

- Shooting down flight UA93 may have occurred but is a protected operation associated with "national security" in that exposing our resolution strategy in such circumstances is highly confidential (even when obvious).

- Depending on the circumstances of the hijackings, we may not even wish to have authorities expose the truth. Did militia do it? Did Mossad do it? Did al-Qaida do it? Did a disgruntled radio-nut do it? In either case the govt doesn't lose much by picking one and running with it. Their choice was perhaps the safest bet politically regardless of the truth, and regardless of the actual implementation of the attack. In any case, if the origin of the attack is unknown (holds true even given the official hijacking formula), it is common practice by law enforcement to pretend to identify the perpetrator in order to root out the actual person/group responsible. This occurs at every level of enforcement (you should recognize this pattern if you've pretty much ever been questioned by police).

Furthermore, if the hijacking took place without requiring 20+ suicidal agents, any security codes that were compromised (assuming the engineers even recognized the security problem in initial system) and/or transmission frequency was known (or were they published in publicly available documentation?).. For example, to allow aircraft to be directed by a hacked auto-pilot system or remote landing/navigational control.. In such a case, we would _expect/demand_ our govt to respond without informing the public (assuming existing aircraft were still so equipped). Even this scenario is consistent with the subsequent avoidance of flying on Boeing aircraft, and also with that subsequent "tail accident" and perhaps even a similar scenario with the space shuttle re-entry.
You'll notice by this rambling that the truth is impossible to even contemplate when so much information is kept secret. :(


In my opinion, the framers believed that the first ammendment would help the people to be more informed than we are today. They appreciated the value of spies, but would not have allowed the current scope/budget we bequeath to our government's secret organizations.

5:33 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

HIGH RESOLUTION VIDEOS OF THE 9/11 HOAX (AND MUCH MORE).

Here you will find hi-resolution video of the (obvious) demolition of World Trade Center Seven and of the (less obvious) demolition of the Towers. The Naudet brothers stunning footage of the first plane hitting the North tower is also presented (at least one of the brothers quite clearly knew the first aircraft was about to hit the North Tower) together with less well known footage of the first plane hitting the tower, accidently caught by someone filming, while waiting in traffic.

If you are using Windows Media Player you need the DivX3.11a codec plug-in (many non-Microsoft movie players come standard with the codecs necessary to play DivX movies (eg Mplayer for Linux)).

If you do not already have it, you can find it here:

http://public.planetmirror.com/pub/divx/windows/divx_3.11alpha.zip

The files from public.planetmirror.com are bit for bit the same (I checked) as those I have had on my system for years (with no harmful effects). You unzip the files and double click on Register_DivX.exe

If you wish to learn about DivX movies, in particular, why they sometimes play upside-down, read this thread:

http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=599

HIGH RESOLUTION VIDEO

Here HiRes (high resolution) video means video recorded with the DivX3.11a codec with the (variable) bitrate set to 6000 and crispness/smoothness set to 100. The HiRes videos are much larger files than necessary for good viewing. They are meant to convey as much of the original detail as possible.

THE FIRST PLANE STRIKE ON THE NORTH TOWER

The First Plane Hitting The North Tower (13 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x408) Copy.
Video taken while waiting to enter the Brooklyn Tunnel (0.8 MB Codec: DivX3.11a 360x240).

THE SECOND PLANE STRIKE ON THE SOUTH TOWER

Plane Hitting South Tower. View from south (10 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x472) Copy.
View from north-east (4.9 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 716x480) Copy.
View from north (13 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x472) Copy.
View from east (1.2 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x356) Copy.
Close view from east (1.3 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x356) Includes the "911 In Plane Site" flash. Copy.
Another view from north (0.8 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x356) Copy.
Short view from north-east (1.2 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 696x472) Copy.
Longer view from north-east (2.8 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 716x480) Copy.

NORTH TOWER DEMOLITION

Video one of the WTC North Tower demolition (2 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 492x408) Copy.
Video two of the WTC North Tower demolition (5.6 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 716x480).
Video three of the WTC North Tower demolition (0.5 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 676x408).
Video four of the WTC North Tower demolition (13 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x472) Copy.
Premature Detonations in North Tower Demolition. (4.8 MB Codec: DivX3.11a 692x472).
North Tower Premature Detonations (Marked) (2.8 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x472) Copy..
More North Tower Premature Detonations (6.1 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 696x472) Copy.
Another view of the North Tower Predetonations (1.4 MB HiRes Codec: MPEG1 352x264).

For those interested, here is an article on the Premature Detonations.

SOUTH TOWER DEMOLITION

Video one of the WTC South Tower demolition (1.6 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 716x480).
Video two of the WTC South Tower demolition (2.3 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x408).
Video three of the WTC South Tower demolition (1.5 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x352).
Video four of the WTC South Tower demolition (1.7 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x356).
South Tower Premature Detonations (Marked) (0.4 MB Codec: DivX3.11a 704x480).

WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDING SEVEN DEMOLITION

The WTC Building Seven Demolition (0.9 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x408) Copy.
The WTC Building Seven Demolition (another view) (0.8 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x408) Copy.
The WTC Building Seven Demolition (yet another view) (9.5 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x408) Copy.
The WTC Building Seven Demolition - Four (0.8 MB Codec: DivX3.11a 360x240)
The WTC Building Seven Demolition - Five (1.1 MB Codec: DivX3.11a 542x407)

PENTAGON

Pentagon Collapse One (2.2 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 696x472) Copy.
Pentagon Collapse Two (0.8 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 696x472) Copy.
Video one of the Pentagon on Fire (4.2 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x480).
Video two of the Pentagon on Fire (3.5 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x464).
Video three of the Pentagon on Fire (1.4 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x464).
Video of the Pentagon damage from the air (9.6 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x480).

WHAT A DEMOLITION LOOKS LIKE

What A Demolition Looks Like (6 MB Codec: DivX3.11a 600x320).

WOMAN WAVING FROM WTC NORTH TOWER IMPACT HOLE.

Woman Waving From WTC North Tower Impact Hole. (1.2 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x356) Copy.

The woman is in the lower righthand corner and why this is of interest.

OTHER VIDEO

Painful Deceptions by Eric Hufschmid (windows media player comes with the necessary codec to play these).

Painful Deceptions. Part 1 (39 MB Codec: WMV1 360x240)
Painful Deceptions. Part 2 (42 MB Codec: WMV1 360x240)
Painful Deceptions. Part 3 (35 MB Codec: WMV1 360x240)
Painful Deceptions. Part 4 (28 MB Codec: WMV1 360x240)
Painful Deceptions - Pentagon Update (5 MB WMV1 360x240)

Alternate Painful Deceptions (only the correct stuff about WTC7 (no missile crap))

Painful Deceptions (22 MB Codec: DivX3.11a 360x235). The section on World Trade Center Seven.

WTC Construction Manager (0.8 MB WMV3 320x240) states WTC would survive multiple airplane strikes.
911 In Plane Site Debunked (25 MB Codec: DivX3.11a 360x240)
911 In Plane Site. (104 MB Codec: DivX5 352x240)
911 In Plane Site. (129 MB Codec: Quicktime MOV 352x240)
Von Kleist admitting possible involvement and even guilt, in the events of 9/11 (1.3 MB Codec: DivX3.11a 340x240).

From the page http://www.question911.com/links.php you can download:

All the "Painful Deceptions" videos mentioned above
Painful Deceptions - 911 Commission Report (25 MB WMV1 360x240)
Painful Deceptions - Pentagon Update (5 MB WMV1 360x240) same as above but misnamed "Uranium Report"
911 In Plane Site Directors Cut. 2 parts (45 MB and 47 MB WMV3 320x240)
911 In Plane Site Update (8 MB WMV1 240x160)

David Griffin talking about 9/11 on CSPAN2 239 MB WMV, also smaller file here 25 MB WMV

MORE 9/11 RESOURCES (ANIMATIONS, BOOKS ETC).

BOOKS:

The New Pearl Harbor by David Ray Griffin (entire book).

ANIMATED GRAPHICS:

Predetonations in the World Trade Center Demolitions Copy 1 and commentary.
North Tower Demolition 0.9 MB Copy 1 and commentary.
South Tower Demolition 2.1 MB Copy 1 and commentary.
First Plane Hits 2.2 MB Copy 1. From Naudet Brothers footage and why this is of interest.
What a jets exhaust does to a car 0.9 MB Copy 1 and why this is of interest.
World Trade Center Seven Demolition 0.6 MB Copy 1.
The dust cloud that gave rise to the WTC6 explosion myth 0.9 MB Copy 1 and why this is of interest.

SOME ARTICLES FROM THE GLOBAL RESEARCH FORUM:

http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewforum.php?f=2

THE 9/11 "MISSILE HITS THE PENTAGON" HOAX.
MANY HI-RESOLUTION VIDEOS OF THE 9/11 HOAX (AND MORE).
WTC TOWERS - PREDETONATIONS OF EXPLOSIVES CAUGHT ON VIDEO.
THE WORLD TRADE CENTER FIRES (NOT SO HOT EH?).
PROOF THE TWIN TOWERS WERE DELIBERATELY DEMOLISHED.
SO WHAT REALLY HAPPENED (TO THE HIJACKED FLIGHTS) ON 9/11?
THE SUPER-LUCKY PENTAGON RETROFIT (A 9/11 SMOKING GUN).
MEDIA RELEASES FAKED PHOTOGRAPHS OF 9-11 PENTAGON EXPLOSION.
THE 9-11 PENTAGON HOAX (WHY A BOEING 757 DID NOT HIT THE PENTAGON).
SO WHAT DID HIT THE PENTAGON? (PROBABLY AN AA BOEING 737)
THE GOVERNMENT FEMA REPORT. ITS AUTHORS DELIBERATELY LIED!!
DID JEWS FRAME THE ARABS FOR 9/11? DID JEWS DO 9/11?
ARREST FOR JEWS CLAIMING GAS CHAMBERS TRUE (BY US MILITARY).
SOME ARTICLES ON THE TRUTH OF THE HOLOCAUST (BONUS VIDEO).
THE HILARIOUS AUSCHWITZ STORY.
MANY OF THE SUPPOSED 9-11 HIJACKERS ARE STILL ALIVE.
EVIDENCE OF EXPLOSIVES IN THE WORLD TRADE CENTER COLLAPSES.
THE MOST OUTRAGEOUS CONSPIRACY THEORY OF THEM ALL.
COMMENTS ON THE WORLD TRADE CENTER DEMOLITION.
THE GOVERNMENT FEMA "INVESTIGATIONS" - TWIN TOWERS - PART 1
THE GOVERNMENT FEMA "INVESTIGATIONS" - TWIN TOWERS - PART 2
THE GOVERNMENT FEMA "INVESTIGATIONS" - WTC SEVEN
CALCULATIONS SAY 14 TONS OF EXPLOSIVE USED TO DOWN EACH WTC TOWER
SHOCK, HORROR, ALLIANZ AG INSURANCE TO INVESTIGATE WTC FIRES?
Versicherungsgesellschaft Allianz AG zum Nachforschen der WTC-Feuer?
WATCH THE WTC EXPLOSIONS HERE. WHAT MORE PROOF DO YOU NEED?
YET ANOTHER 9/11 SMOKING GUN (NO AUTOS BLOWN OFF FREEWAY)?
WOMAN WAVING FROM WTC NORTH TOWER IMPACT HOLE (VIDEO).
THE FAKE EXPLOSION AT WORLD TRADE CENTER SIX.
FACTS ABOUT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER TOWERS.
THE RAG "POPULAR MECHANICS" LOSES ALL CREDIBILITY.
Plaguepuppy, Paul Thompson, Ewing2001. ALL FALSE OPPOSITION?
http://letsroll911.org = FALSE OPPOSITION IN PLAIN SIGHT.
IS ERIC HUFSCHMID A CLEVER PROPAGANDA AGENT?
"911 IN PLANE SITE." A TOTALLY BOGUS PRODUCTION.
Joël van der Reijden = MORE FALSE OPPOSITION.
THE PENTA-LAWN 2000 HOAX.
9/11 PREDICTED IN 1961?

9/11 WEB-SITES

These are deliberately suppressed, so I specially mention them.

http://guardian.150m.com (has smaller images for faster downloads)
http://guardian.250free.com (has smaller images for faster downloads)
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/
http://911review.org/Wget/www.nerdcities.com/guardian/
http://thewebfairy.com/nerdcities/

THE COMPLETE GOVERNMENT FEMA REPORT INTO THE WORLD TRADE CENTER COLLAPSES.

Introduction - The FEMA "investigations" Copy 1.
WTC 1 and WTC 2 - The Twin Towers - The FEMA "investigations" Copy 1.
WTC 3 - The FEMA "investigations" Copy 1.
WTC 4,5 and 6 - The FEMA "investigations" Copy 1.
WTC 7 - The FEMA "investigations" Copy 1.
The Bankers Trust Building - The FEMA "investigations" Copy 1.
Peripheral Buildings - The FEMA "investigations" Copy 1.
Overview of Fire Protection in Buildings - The FEMA "investigations" Copy 1.
Structural Steel and Steel Connections - The FEMA "investigations" Copy 1.
WTC Steel Data Collection - The FEMA "investigations" Copy 1.

Please add to this list here http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=679 (No Login Necessary).

Copied from http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=599

8:50 PM  
Blogger Neal Romanek said...

Great blog! Thanks! And keep up the good work!

4:36 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

George wrote:

The articles, videos and audio clips linked to herein are the copyrights of their respective owners...

But many of the links are to files (not web pages) being served by web sites to which George is not linking.

That is a breach of 'netiquette; a minor theft (from the good guys!) of services.

George, if you're going to steal another site's bandwidth, the least you could do is offer thanks to that site and provide a link to it, instead of just linking to that site's content as if it were your own.

Please at least give credit where credit is due...

12:37 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous (far above, poster of the many many links) left the following:

THE FIRST PLANE STRIKE ON THE NORTH TOWER

The First Plane Hitting The North Tower (13 MB HiRes Codec: DivX3.11a 692x408) Copy.


But that "13 MB HiRes" file is BOGUS! (What good is high resolution with low accuracy? And why provide us with a link to bogus video? Is that not the government's job?)

It totally lacks the blatantly obvious, mysterious "flash frame" -- that unnaturally bright brief burst of light -- upon impact.

That burst of light can be seen prominently on the Naudet video DVD, as well as on this original off-the-air VHS recording made on 9/11:

733M 68min DivX of off-the-air video recorded on 9/11, including stuff that never went out over the air ever again

Perhaps we need to start keeping a list of those who would have us believe that there never was any mysterious "flash frame", including:

The anonymous poster (far above)
Dick Cheney
Kyle Hence
David Kubiak
Condoleeza Rice
Emanuel Sferios
Darth Rumsfeld
Mark Robinowitz
John Kerry
George Bush

1:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Big News From The Healthcare Industry!!

+++++++++++Current Profile+++++++++++
Faceprint Global Solutions (FCPG)
Current Price $0.15
A company with hot new identity solution products
and licenses with over 40 current governmental and
non-governmental contracts in negotiations.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Is this an undiscovered gem priced to go higher!!
Please read the following Announcement in its Entirety and Consider the Possibilities�
Watch this One to Trade!

FCPG volume trading is beginning to surge with this landslide Announcement. The value of this
stock appears poised for growth! This one should not remain on the ground floor for long.

BREAKING NEWS!!

Faceprint Global Solutions (FCPG) is pleased to announce that its European partner, Keyvelop, has teamed up with IBM's Partner World Industry Networks to deliver customer software requirement solutions for the international healthcare industry.
With FGS owning the exclusive North American rights to distribute the worlds leading encryption and transmission software developed by Keyvelop, FGS is poised to capture large volumes of sales generated by customers currently using IBM's software in the healthcare and other industries.
With traceability and security now deemed a serious business priority, companies are increasingly focused on employing procedures and controls designed to ensure the authenticity, integrity and confidentiality of electronic records.
"This is a very positive move for FGS and for Keyvelop," said FGS CEO Pierre Cote. "We are very happy about the decision to go with IBM. This is a continuation of the progress made by everyone associated with FGS and its partners."
Buell Duncan, IBM's general manager of ISV & Developer Relations commented, "Collaborating with Keyvelop will ensure that we develop open solutions that are easy to maintain and cost effective for our customers in the healthcare and life sciences industry."
Among other things, this new software technology which is currently being used by a number of European healthcare companies, is used to send any file, regardless of format or size. Encryption keys, evidence of transmission integrity with fingerprint calculation, time-stamping of all actions and status record updating, pre-checking sender and receiver identities, validating file opening dates are part of Keyvelop features.
About FacePrint Global Solutions, Inc.
FGS operates a business, which develops and delivers a variety of technology solutions, including biometric software applications on smart cards and other support mediums (apometric solutions). FGS's products provide biometric solutions for identity authentication and a host of smart card- and biometrics-related hardware peripherals and software applications. Apometrix, FGS's wholly-owned subsidiary, combines on-card or in-chip multi-application management solutions with best-of-breed 'in-card matching' biometrics. Keyvelop's secure digital envelope solution and Apometrix's on-card biometrics work together to produce the winning combination in the fields of security, traceability and identity management. FGS is headquartered in Fresno, California.
Conclusion:

The examples above show the Awesome, Earning Potential of little known Companies That Explode onto Investor's Radar Screens. This stock will not be a Secret for long. Then You May Feel the Desire to Act Right Now! And Please Watch This One Trade!
GO FCPG!

All statements made are our express opinion only and should be treated as such. We may own, take position and sell any securities mentioned at any time. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements." Forward looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. This profile is in no way affiliated with the featured company. We were compensated one thousand dollars from third party (IR Marketing) to distribute this report. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects". in compliance with Section 17(b), we disclose the holding of FGS shares prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares. Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. Since we own shares, there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward- looking statements. This is not solicitation to buy or sell stocks, this text is for informational purpose only and you should seek professional advice from registered financial advisor before you do anything related with buying or selling stocks, penny stocks are very high risk and you can lose your entire investment.

5:28 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Keep in mind that some of the behavior exhibited by authorities is consistent with expected national security protocols. Take the following three occasions, for example:

- "Pulling" of the WTC buildings may indeed have been intentional, but deemed as necessary to avoid the impending tipping over of the building...



Fine, lets say I accept this as the actual reality.

Why doesn't the offical report SAY this is what happened?

And, as you claim the above is "consistent with expected national security protocols.", please quote chapter and verse with the official document that backs your claim up?

5:36 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home