Friday, December 02, 2005

Too Hot

The fact that the World Trade Centers were brought down with high-explosives can be proven by the extreme temperatures which remained at ground zero for months.

Specifically, it rained heavily on September 14, 2001

Yet, as of September 18, 2001, ABC reported that "the temperature at the core of 'the pile,' is near 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, according to fire officials, who add that the fires are too deep for firefighters to get to"

It rained again on September 21, 2001, and on some other days during the next couple months (search other dates under "History & Almanac")

Yet fires were still burning 3 months later

Indeed, the trade center fire was "the longest-burning structural fire in history"

As if that weren't enough, liquid metal and glowing debris were found at the trade centers six weeks after 9/11. See also additional accounts of molten metal here (under the heading "What caused the molten steel in the residue at WTC towers?")

Could an office fire -- even one started by burning jet fuel -- have done that? The answer is clearly negative.

Initially, normal office fires do not create liquid metal.

Moreover, normal office fires would have been extinguished by the collapse of the buildings they were housed in. In other words, ignoring the reason the towers collapsed, the collapse itself should have extinguished virtually all of the fire due to air pressure and the tremendous mass and collision forces crushing the burning materials.

The fires would have also been quickly doused by the tremendous amount of high tech foams and water to which they were subjected. It rained, but more importantly, "firetrucks [sprayed] a nearly constant jet of water on" ground zero.

"You couldn't even begin to imagine how much water was pumped in there," said Tom Manley of the Uniformed Firefighters Association, the largest fire department union. "It was like you were creating a giant lake."


Anonymous Anonymous said...

They also sprayed the fires and piles with high-tech sprays too, in addition to the water.

6:27 PM  
Blogger bb said...

How accurate are the reports that most of the material left at the site was 'shipped overseas without being analyzed?' How well do we know what happened to the physical evidence? Is there an authoritative, trustworthy source?

8:24 PM  
Blogger Daniel F said...

Professor Jones noted this in his
paper proving that explosives were involved. He said it was thermite.
His paper is still up at BYU.

He also noted other evidence. Then there is the matter of the
million dollar reward offered by Jimmy Walter.

7:55 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just a minor correction daniel f,
the correct URL for the million dollar reward offered by Jimmy Walter is ..:: Reopen 9/11 - Catch the Real Terrorists ::..

4:08 AM  
Blogger Ringwind said...

Google: 9/11 and October Surprise scandal

6:48 AM  
Anonymous DOUGLAS CLARK said...


2:25 PM  
Blogger Masher1 said...

TMD's and there basic construction and the fuel mass NEEDED to sustain a 8 week plus contained crucible fire is explored on this thread.

4:15 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home