Wednesday, August 08, 2007

How Can You NOT Get It?

Many timid writers and commentators are finally waking up to the fact that the powers-that-be are whipping up fear of the enemy in order to justify their imperial wars of aggression and a consolidation of power at home.

For example, liberal website Buzzflash is today running as its main story an editorial comparing Bush and company to the Nazis, and discussing how the Nazis bullied the legislature into passing the enabling act after the Reichstag fire.

But they're missing the most important piece of the puzzle: the Nazis themselves lit the Reichstag fire and blamed it on others (if you have trouble playing the clip, it is because the website hosting the clip requires you to download the clip before playing it). The fire was the event which justified Hitler's seizure of power and suspension of liberties.

And it is widely known that the Nazis, in Operation Himmler, faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland.

And it wasn't just the Nazis. False flag attacks have almost always been the real root of wars and empires.

This reality of the millenia-long secret of false flag terror is right in front of your eyes.

How can you NOT get it?

Send this essay to everyone who doesn't get it. And demand that military, law enforcement and intelligence personnel, politicians and other government employees sign the Pledge For America.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

There's only one important question concerning the attacks, did the US gov't allow/participate in 9/11?

The answer to that query would explain the illegal wire-taps, suspension of habeas corpus, banning of books like America Deceived (book) from Amazon, detaining of dissenters in fences miles away from events, and multiple wars based on lies.

How can the gov't be innocent in 9/11 when we have caught it lying so many times (WACO, Ruby Ridge, no WMDs, USS Liberty, Operation Northwoods, Gulf of Tonkin, Pearl Harbor, ETC.)?

In law, if you determine a person lies ONCE during his testimony, it can be assumed that he lied in the remainder of his testimony. How come we do not hold the gov't to the same standard as it holds us to?

The gov't lied to us about Iraq and more Americans have died there than in 9/11. If the gov't lied about Iraq then why is everyone so reluctant to believe that the gov't lied about 9/11?

2:06 PM  
Anonymous Travellerev said...

Hi there,

I posted a comment under the Weimar piece on Buzzflash, and they placed it immediately.

I thought I place it here too in case it get's canned again.

Let me introduce myself.

I am a 51 year old white woman not prone to conspiracy theories. I don't believe in aliens, do not posses crystals or throw the I Ching. I am connected to the Internet with the fastest broadband connection I could find and spent 6 hours a day researching for articles I write.
When I grew up in Holland I was taught in History class that the Dutchman Marinus van der Lubbe, the guy whom the Nazi's alleged to have been the sole perpetrator of the fire that gave Hitler his dictatorial power, was in fact a patsy. Marinus van der Lubbe was a of low intelligence and did not have access to the building, but they told the German people that he was a dangerous communist and he was hung for the crime.
The Reichstag fire was started in multiple areas in such a short time that it would not have allowed a single man to have committed this act. It may very well be that Marinus van der Lubbe thought he was committing an act of rebellion against Nazi Germany and as such have participated with his captors in setting the building alight, but he was not alone and his co-conspirators did have access to the building. They had access trough the underground tunnels that were in control of the Nazis.

Goering has been noted to say that people will not believe a small lie, but they will believe a big one as the reality is just to big and dangerous to admit to.

But facing the big lie is exactly what America must do.
9/11 was an inside job, and it is dangerous for the American people to be kept in the dark about the reality. Do your job and allow an open discussion on this subject on your otherwise impeccable site. You can not afford to deny your readers the access they desperately need to the information about the 9/11 American Reichstag fire understand why the democrats are behaving the way they do. I beg of you, do your job. Be brave and face the big lie, and know that you are not alone.

Kind regards

3:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sorry folks but 9/11 was not an inside job, it was an Israeli job. People aren't stupid and they're figuring out the bankers game.

6:18 PM  
Blogger ronheri said...

911 was an inside job...period! there is so much evidence it is beyond any doubt. Check it out

8:25 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This sick mentality of ignoring the law is not limited to President Bush. The disregard for the rule of law runs throughout the elites who dominate the public dialog.

The public is not being give a fair chance to learn the facts and this has resulted in people, I don't know how many, developing erroneous theories.

I have been examining the terrorism issue for many years. U.S. politicians abuse power and violate basic principles. These are several serious issues that need to be discussed, for example: President Bush’s war crimes.

Distracting people from dealing with the real issues is this notion that the Bush and others carried out the 9/11 attacks. The insistence on the erroneous theory that "9/11 was an inside job" undermines efforts at setting things right and protecting the American people. Please take a sincere effort to read over the info at these links: (there are several links in this blog post). If you have any questions, I will answer them. (You can click on the name "Anonymous" above to go to this page.

9:20 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm an NSA agent and I'm taking all of your names and IP addresses!

Then I'm going to sell them to hightimes mag.

Then I'm going to arrest everyone who doubted this president. He's a good man who believes in crucifying liberals like Jesus.

9:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'll tell you how I can 'not get it'. After it's been drilled into me for my entire life that the government and all our laws are there to 'protect' me from something, and I trust the government, the asking me to believe that it's not true is asking me to change my entire view of the world. Sort of like asking me to question my own religious beliefs. I'd rather go into deep denial. If you want some progress convincing me that the government is not my friend, You'll have to overcome all my prior conditioning. Got any ideas how you're going to do that?

10:08 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think many people already realize that politicians can pursue and do purse agendas that don't serve the interests of the general public but rather the interests of rich and powerful special interests. So I disagree with the notice that a whole belief system has to change.
I think people do need to make a good effort at logic. Fact is, many of the assumptions of the "inside job theory" violate the internal logic of the 9/11 attacks.

For example, Google "Why Do You Think They Fireproof Steel Trusses?" and also Google "WTC Pre-Collapse Bowing Debunks 9/11 "Controlled Demolition" Theory"
(click on the name "anonymous" in this post to see this link)

10:38 PM  
Blogger Sean O'Neil said...

Sorry folks but 9/11 was not an inside job, it was an Israeli job. People aren't stupid and they're figuring out the bankers game.

Wait a minute. Was it Israelis, or was it bankers?

What do "the bankers" have to do with "Israelis"?

And how can you know for sure that the "Israelis" weren't hired by Americans to work for America?

Do you assume that Israel controls the world? If so, what makes you draw that conclusion?


Are you typing from a mental institution?

11:34 PM  
Blogger The Prudent Investor said...

A post from November 2005

1:12 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Reports on Marinus van der Lubbe were that he was beheaded for his alleged crime. Also, no need for elaborate conspracy theories. The confusion created distracts from basic questions of competence and reponsibility for the reactions of our fearless leaders under fire. When in history did a commander get a pass for choking-- like a rookie facing his first major league fastball -- when his command post was under fire for seven minutes. Also, why should we continue funding high performance fighter aircraft when they are off allegedly playing war games and neglecting their duty as on 9-11. I looked in vain for the world's most expensive jets opeated by the USAF as I watched the twin towers burn and crumble. For a few thousand dollars, the WTC security could have bought their own Stinger missles. For the cost of ONE F-14, every major city could have Stingers -- any commercial aircraft entering the city zone would risk destruction if another 9-11 ocurred.

7:10 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"the Nazis themselves lit the Reichstag fire and blamed it on others ..."

NO THEY DIDN'T. They keep repeating this PC nonsense. There was a wide-open internationally observed trial following the Reichstag fire (opposite of 911). They did, however, politically exploit it to the max.

You jerks keep trying to confuse the Reichstag fire with the Bush crime gang's 911 false flag attacks!

7:42 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"...9/11 was not an inside job, it was an Israeli job."

Correct. Israeli - oh, pardon me, "Neo-con" - with the full compliance of the treasonous Bush crime gang.

7:46 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

the leach is killing it's host:

8:20 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

reply to anonymous 10:38:

I 'googled' your links. They prove little to nothing. where to start? let's see, any column bowing does not prove detonators were not set off. is that something that needs to be clarified? it shouldnt. The truss theory was thrown out and debunked long ago. Prestigious institutions have tested the truss theory to see if floors would sag and the tests came back negative when real life parameters were in place during the physical simulations. you simply havent done your homwwork. we are not kooks. I went from believing it was "terrah", to being a lihopper, to finally being a mihopper (they made it happen on purpose). even without bombs in the buildings (and you cannot explain the molten metal under all three buildings either) you still have cheney/norad/bush-booker-elementary/last-minute-changes-of-faa-rules...etc etc etc. guess what? if they let it happen on purpose, then they made it happen. why is it so hard to see that? this is the same government that did inner-city-crack-cocaine-iran-contra-guns-drugs-tuskeegee-gulf-of-tonkin-etc.

even bush is on record for himself with his own mouth discussing plans to blame a plane shoot down on saddam after painting the plane with UN colors.

criminal he is.

'google' that.

1:18 AM  
Anonymous PFT said...

I like to think I have a decent handle on what is going on, at least based on the information publicly available.

I have went from believing the official version, to disbelief as I started to question the Iraq war and then caught on about 9/11, then came anger, and after this frustration with others who would just write me off as a conspiracy theorist in need of therapy, and as time has went on, to acceptance.

The acceptance part came after I figured out the motive. No, it is not that the Bush administration is a bunch of evil SOB's and GWB the anti-christ and they are taking the country fascist, at least I hope not.

The motive was to ensure that the US will be able to survive the next World War. That war was scheduled to be fought 20 years from now with a Russian-China alliance over the remaining oil supplies. Without ensuring energy security and waiting until China had strengthened themselves sufficiently, military, industrial capacity and economically, then we certainly would be defeated, since we are no longer self sufficient in oil and industrial capacity. Without oil, you can not fight a War. Without adequate industrial capacity, you can not build enough weapons, ships, vehicles, etc fast enough to win a large War.

That War may be fought sooner rather than later after we invade Iran, hope not, but we control the Middle East oil now, and have superior weaponry, naval and air supremacy, so maybe not. I do not have a crystal ball to know might happen when we go after Iran, but all signs point to us doing so.

As for the Towers collapsing. Initially after I started questioning the official version, I thought it must be the government behind it, since they certainly have covered it up. Now I believe that a group outside of government got wind of this and decided to profit from the attacks the government was willing to allow to happen. If the towers did not collapse, there would have been far fewer fatalities, that was the real crime that I found unacceptable. I could understand the government not responding fast enough to stop the planes hitting the towers. But they had to cover up Silversteins and his accomplices crime, because that would have exposed their own awareness of the attack that was coming.

As for the Pentagon, I am not sure any plane filled with passengers hit it, probably a missile or small plane laden with explosives, but where did it go?. Can't say. Shot down over the ocean like UA 93 over Pennsylvania? Maybe. But shooting those planes down, if they were shot down, was justified, thats what we wanted them to do to the planes that hit the tower, remember?

Then came all the lies, deception to get us in Iraq and keep us there, again, pretty distasteful, but if you can accept the motive as being justified, it goes down a little better. I may be deluding myself, but that works for me. If I am wrong, well, things may be too advanced anyways to do anything about it. So enjoy the show, try not to get too upset. Stress is unhealthy.

2:47 AM  
Blogger John Doraemi said...

"The motive was to ensure that the US will be able to survive the next World War. That war was scheduled to be fought 20 years from now with a Russian-China alliance over the remaining oil supplies."

That's an interesting theory, and probably not too off the mark. I don't like the word "scheduled" though. They do risk assessment, and so the scenario must have come up.

GW gets some ignorant debunker types here. I wish you guys would at least read the facts so you would at least have some cursory understanding of what you're arguing.

6:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To the anonymous poster who urges us to visit his CD-debunking 'tinyurl' site, I have this to say:

Your site is unbelievably weak.

Below is a copy of my posting on your weak site:

"This site, and all those it links to, neglect to deal with a vast sum of pertinent evidence. For instance; the MOLTEN METAL.

Bowing and sagging? Are you kidding me? THAT's what you're using to "disprove" the controlled demolition hypothesis?!

Haven't you ever heard of demolition pre-weakening or pre-cutting? --
-- What do you think the thermate was used for? What do you think the multiple explosions that ocurred well before the collapse were achieving?

"Bowing and sagging" could very well indeed be interpreted as further support of the CD hypothesis -- as though we really needed any more evidence to confirm that which is beyond all reasonable doubt.

In any case, the fact that this entire site is so absurdly narrow in focus, and so utterly devoid of sound, robust hypotheses, should lead any researcher worth his or her salt to largely ignore it."

As for the poster who has passed into the stage of so-called "acceptance," perhaps seeing the 911 false-flag op as being justifiable in terms of strategic energy protection; I have this to say:

It's time to start researching the work of the Advanced Energy Research Organization and the Disclosure Project (search Google Video and & I think you'll understand my beef with your logic once you start down that path.

There are overwhelming reasons for optimism. Take action however you can, and feel lucky to be alive in this era of awakening.

7:33 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home