Sunday, September 03, 2006

Disrespectful to the Victims

A common tactic that 9/11 apologists use for changing the subject away from 9/11 truth is to claim that questioning the official version is "disrespectful to the victims and their families".

In fact, half of the victim's families believe that 9/11 was an inside job (listen to this interview). Many family and friends of victims not only support the search for 9/11 truth, but they demand it (please ignore the partisan tone). See also this interview.

Indeed, it has now become so clear that the 9/11 Commission was a whitewash that the same 9/11 widows who called for the creation of the 9/11 Commission are now demanding a new investigation (see also this video).

And dying heroes, soon-to-be victims themselves, the first responders who worked tirelessly to save lives on and after 9/11, say that controlled demolition brought down the Twin Towers and that a real investigation is necessary.

So next time someone tells you that questioning 9/11 is disrespectful to the victims, show him or her the facts contained in this story, and educate them to the fact that NOT questioning the heinous lie passing for the official story is what is truly disrespectful to the victims and their families. For failing to uncover the truth of 9/11 will mean that the victims died in vain: just 3,000 of countless victims of false flag terror committed by Western (and other) governments from Rome to the present.

If, instead, the truth of 9/11 is revealed and the perpetrators are brought to justice, the victims of this horrible tragedy will have helped educate America and the world as to the secret history of false flag terror, and their deaths will have been heroic and honorable.

See also this essay.




3 Comments:

Anonymous S. King said...

The tactic of changing the subject away from the truth is the foundation of the so-called 9/11 "Truth" Movement, a collection of politically motivated, deniers of sceince, facts and evidence.

One such well-known apologist in the "truth" movement is Prof. Steven Jones of "Scholars for 9/11 Truth", an organization of politically-motivated "scholars", the vanguard of a growing movement of unethical people not seen since the heyday of Holocaust Denial.

Steven Jones has been comprehensively debunked by many real experts, most notably here:

Demolition Expert Debunks Demolition Theory Nonsense

"Good Science and 9-11 Demolition Theories." Unethical practices by Scholars for 9/11 Truth.

The practice of shifting the burden of proof away from those making claims based on false information and a lack of concern for the truth is the hallmark of 9/11 Denial.

Your blog has always been an excellent illustration of the extent to which desperation propels the 9/11 "Truth" Movement to engage in shifting the burden of proof from themselves.

It has not worked and will not work as more and more decent and honest Americans become aware of the 9/11 "Truth" Movement's unethical practices.

That includes the blazen insult by this blog to the good memory of George Washington.

9:45 AM  
Blogger jtgnpm said...

s.king is wrong --

9/11 as an inside job is pointless to discuss. Simply put, the (documented) paties could not possibly have done it and the most protected airspace in the world (around the Pentagon), was, like the President on 09/11, security stripped - both easy targets for the coup plotters, who got everything they wanted from Bush's capitulation.

As for disrespect, the coup plotters (the shadow government) view all victims equally. Many victims have fallen and more will fall along the way to their goal of global hegemony. Clearly, they respect nothing.

Naive perspectives such as s.king's, fellow deniers' and even many 911truthers' miss the big picture: flase flag terror is a viciously cynical and effectively lethal weapon in the oligarchs' eternal war on the hapless rabble and has been for centuries. We must break it before their faces if we hope to stop WWIII.

3:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I just read all of sking 's so called "articals" that totally "debunk" proffessor Stevens and they are the same load of outdated crap that could be copied and most likely was copied off of the official white house website. In true bush fashion One of them says the page isn't even available, some proof there king, if you believe in using bush tacktics like that to prove your point than I have a peice of my foot to sell to the inside of your ass you cocksucker. The other so called "articals" that did pop up and I'm sure sking didn't even read himself were just a quick note that was copied by some company who was paid to do so. Any independant non partisen non profit respectable scholars on the credits for those "articals of Scientific proof" there sking you pussy.

11:58 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home