Wednesday, February 01, 2006

5 Reasons to Question the Official 9/11 Story

(1) While the government has consistently stated that it did not know where the aircraft were before they struck, the Secretary of Transportation testified before the 9/11 Commission that Vice President Cheney monitored flight 77 for many miles as it approached the Pentagon and -- when a military man asked "do the orders still stand?" -- Cheney responded affirmatively:

"The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to, "The plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the vice president, "Do the orders still stand?" And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"
(video of testimony)

(2) The tape of interviews of air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 was intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand, cutting the tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash cans around the building
? and

(3) The Secret Service, which is highly trained to whisk the president away from danger and to a secure location in the event of a threat, breached all standard procedures and allowed President Bush to remain at a highly-publicized location for 25 minutes after it was known that the nation was under attack

(4) In addition to the Twin Towers, a third world trade center building, WTC7, collapsed on the afternoon of 9/11. WTC7 was never hit by plane, contained only small fires before the collapse, fell at free-fall speed (the same speed as if there were no floors or walls to cause resistance), collapsed symetrically (which makes no sense since fires burned in only some parts of the building), became the first steel-frame building in history to collapse due to fire alone, somehow generated temperatures so high that its huge steel beams were partly evaporated, and produced unusual chemical reactions consistent with the use of high-explosives.

Indeed, even the government agency investigating the collapse said that -- other than an explanation involving demolition with bombs -- "the [next] best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence." and

(5) Recently declassified documents show that in the 1960's, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba.

This plan is only one of a series created over hundreds of years by governments around the world to garner support for their military agendas by sponsoring terrorism and then blaming it on others, or intentionally allowing an enemy's attack to succeed as a Pearl Harbor type justification for war. Indeed, this technique has been used for so long that Plato discussed it back in ancient Greece. and northwoods.pdf">

There are literally hundreds of other reasons to question the official story about what happened on 9/11. The 9/11 Commission never addressed these issues. Indeed, even the former director of the FBI says there was a cover up by the 9/11 Commission:

If this list of 5 facts has made you the slightest bit curious, and are good places to look for answers.


Post a Comment

<< Home