Monday, December 12, 2005

High-Level Officials Warn of Fake Terror

A variety of current and former high-level officials have recently warned that the Bush administration is attempting to instill a dictatorship in America, and will itself carry out a fake terrorist attack in order to obtain one.

Background

FBI agents, Time Magazine, Keith Olbermann and The Washington Post and Rolling Stone have all stated that the administration has issued terror alerts based on scant intelligence in order to rally people around the flag when the administration was suffering in the polls. This implies — as an initial matter only — that the administration will play fast and loose with the facts in order to instill fear for political purposes

More to the point, a former prominent republican congressman stated that the U.S. is close to becoming a totalitarian society and that the Bush administration is using fear to try to ensure that this happens.

General Tommy Franks stated that if another terrorist attack occurs in the United States "the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government".

Current U.S. Congressman Ron Paul stated, the government "is determined to have martial law", and that the government is hoping to get the people "fearful enough that they will accept the man on the white horse"

And Daniel Ellsberg, the famous Pentagon Papers whistleblower, said "if there is another terror attack, "I believe the president will get what he wants", which will include a dictatorship.

Terror on U.S. Citizens by American Government?

But would the government actually kills its own people to instill sufficient fear so that it can get what it wants? Read what the following very smart people are saying, and then judge for yourself:

A retired 27-year CIA analyst who prepared and presented Presidential Daily Briefs and served as a high-level analyst for several presidents, stated that if there was another major attack in the U.S., it would lead to martial law. He went on to say:

"We have to be careful, if somebody does this kind of provocation, big violent explosions of some kind, we have to not take the word of the masters there in Washington that this was some terrorist event because it could well be a provocation allowing them, or seemingly to allow them to get what they want."

The former CIA analyst would not put it past the government to "play fast and loose" with terror alerts and warnings and even events themselves in order to rally people behind the flag


The former assistant secretary of treasury in the Reagan administration, called the "Father of Reaganomics", who is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and Scripps Howard News Service, and, said:

"Ask yourself: Would a government that has lied us into two wars and is working to lie us into an attack on Iran shrink from staging "terrorist" attacks in order to remove opposition to its agenda?" He goes on to say:

If the Bush administration wants to continue its wars in the Middle East and to entrench the "unitary executive" at home, it will have to conduct some false flag operations that will both frighten and anger the American people and make them accept Bush's declaration of "national emergency" and the return of the draft. Alternatively, the administration could simply allow any real terrorist plot to proceed without hindrance.

A series of staged or permitted attacks would be spun by the captive media as a vindication of the neoconsevatives' Islamophobic policy, the intention of which is to destroy all Middle Eastern governments that are not American puppet states. Success would give the US control over oil, but the main purpose is to eliminate any resistance to Israel's complete absorption of Palestine into Greater Israel.

Think about it. If another 9/11-type "security failure" were not in the works, why would Homeland Security czar Chertoff go to the trouble of convincing the Chicago Tribune that Americans have become complacent about terrorist threats and that he has "a gut feeling" that America will soon be hit hard?

A member of the British Parliament stated that "there is a very real danger" that the American government will stage a false flag terror attack in order to justify war against Iran and to gain complete control domestically

The former UN Weapons Inspector, an American, who stated before the Iraq war started that there were no weapons of mass destruction is now saying that he would not rule out staged government terror by the U.S. government.

And an allegedly-leaked GOP memo touts a new terror attack as a way to reverse the party's decline.

No way, That's Nuts

Sounds nuts, right?

Sorry to have to tell you, but "false flag terror" -- that is, state-sponsored terrorism, blamed on the "bad guys" of choice -- is an age-old trick which has been used by governments around the world for thousands of years to consolidate power and create support from their people. See this article on the Reichstag fire, and this article on the perennial ploy of those grabbing power.

But even very recent events provide a glimpse into the world of false flag terror:

On October 12, 2005, Australia's largest newspaper quoted the well-respected former Indonesian president as saying that the government had a role in the Bali bombings

And Americans dressed as Arabs have apparently been setting off car bombs in Iraq (apparently, when it was discovered that some of the cars used in Iraqi bombings recently came from the U.S., the cover story became American cars were involved in car bombings only because they had recently been stolen from the U.S. and then shipped to Iraq -- but does it make senes that Iraqi insurgents would steal cars in the U.S. and ship them all the way to Iraq?)

Similarly, Britain's false flag attacks in Basra made the news in September. And the press has acknowledged that the death of the lead investigator into the Basra incident was mysterious.

And 9/11 itself was a false flag terror operation.

History proves that the officials' warnings of a terror attack by our own government are well-founded.




15 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Then is there a solution to all this? Or is it "All is Lost", and we then have no choice but to commit suicide so as not to be slaves, as the Imperial Romans did long ago?

Answer, please.

3:36 PM  
Blogger George Washington said...

There is a solution, and all is not lost.

In reality, it is a competition. If you've ever watched a high-level sports event (for example, the NBA Finals), usually the team that competes harder wins.

There are very powerful people with alot of money who want to carry out another false flag operation.

However, they are few, and we -- the people of good faith who want to preserve our democratic republic -- are many.

If we reach out and educate others NOW, we will win the competition, and for the first time in the many many hundreds of years that the false flag game has been played, a population will wake up to the con game and reclaim its power.

The power and the future are in our hands.

4:14 PM  
Blogger somebigguy said...

Spectacular!!!

Keep up the good work...

6:51 PM  
Anonymous Die for the Elite said...

Excellent compilation, and most timely. Great work, GW.

12:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Webster Griffin Tarpley, the co-author of "The Unofficial Biography of George Bush" (Sr.) and author of "9/11: Synthetic Terror" has much to say about Western state-sponsored terrorism.

Here is a transcript of an interview he did on Bonnie Faulkner's 'Guns and Butter' radio show back in April;

Part One.
http://www.gnn.tv/B10888

Part Two.
http://www.gnn.tv/B11078

Tarpley and Faulkner allude to something called the 'Strategy of Tension', here is more on that;

NATO, Gladio, & the Stategy of Tension
http://www.gnn.tv/B11359

------------------------

If you are unfamiliar with 'Operation Northwoods' here is an excellent introduction in streaming Real Player.

Operation Northwoods/ What Do You Want To Be When You Blow Up?
http://www.wfmu.org/listen.ram?show=4100

From the archives of Dave Emory, anti-fascist researcher.
http://www.wfmu.org/playlists/DX

7:13 AM  
Blogger JoeBuckstrap said...

Considering the fact that Rumsfeld modified the succession of government protocols during this past Christmas holiday week and Dumbya is alleged to have issued Executive Orders memorializing the police state outlined by Oliver North during the Iran-Contra escapades, we should expect the another iteration of synthesized terror courtesy of the Dumbya dictatorship in the near future.

To posit that we may have a dictatorship after the next terrorist attack is to deny the current reality: we already have a dictatorship. The Constitution has been assaulted in the most grotesque way through two fraudulent elections, the shredding of the Bill of Rights and a legislature that rubber stamps the largesse of the criminal regime, not to mention the mass murder of Americans by our government on 9/11, which was neither criminally investigated or criminally prosecuted. What more proof do you need?

7:00 AM  
Anonymous worried said...

"If we reach out and educate others NOW, we will win"... I have been doing this for nearly 3 years (shortly after I found out about 9/11 myself). Unfortunately, most people are more willing to believe that you are completely nuts than they will believe the government is using terror against us. I've only opened the eyes of a few people. The other 50? They stopped associating with me and probably believe I'm a terrorist myself. There must be another solution.

12:20 PM  
Blogger tomtom said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

3:17 PM  
Blogger tomtom said...

If the 9/11 event was a sponsored or a staged event as many try to prove. This could not be done by a very small group. There must be many individuals that knew parts of this plan. In such a large group there are always drop outs. Where are those people with an aching concience and get there stories or are they so indoctrinated or afraid or already murdered. I would not be surprised at all to see the US involved in its second civil war. The US press failed big time. WHEN I GOT MY MILITARY COMMANDO TRAINING SOME 40 YEARS AGO THE ADAGIO WAS GET THE RADIO AND TV STATIONS FIRST AND TAKE THE ALTERNATIVE VOICE AWAY. Apparantly the neo cons were very successfull in doing so today in their own country. Howabout internet now? They will silence the net too mark my words. Like the Middle East providers can block sites that show nudity or porn. So what can you do..?!?!?!?!? Guys get your guns out you have plenty of those.

TomTom
Never get lost
Amsterdam
The Netherlands

3:29 PM  
Blogger Demitria Monde Thraam said...

EVERYONE needs to do outreach work on a daily basis for there to be even the slightest chance of drowning out the "Karl Rove Mafia talking points" version of reality pouring like a shit-faucet into millions of American living-rooms via millions of credit-card financed cable television screens.

This outreach work should include providing entertainment, stimulation and distraction from that "black box" called TV. Everyone knows at least one person who watches television regularly. What if we all made a point of taking that person out to dinner or to some other recreation maybe once every week or two? People watch TV because they're overworked in a tanking economy, they're scared, tired and likely have less discretionary income than they used to. They don't want to hear about how TV is run by corporatist cabals which underwrite all that work B*shCo. is doing to make that "dictator" quip of his become a reality (he is definitely the least sane and most callously-mannered president this country has EVER had) The thing is, I am finding people are no longer in denial about 9/11, AT THE CORE, but they aren't ready to deal with it either.

People who voted for B*sh and think of themselves as conservative or evangelical want so much to believe in him they will ignore the glaring obviousness that someone who says the things B*sh has said without shame, ignore all the obscene gestures and frat-prank gags about serious matters of life-and-death, because he said God made him president, and when they lose faith in B*sh they are (in their minds) deriding their God.

They are also resistent to dealing with it because having voted for him makes them realise they played some small role in causing it to happen, and that's sort of overwhelming. So much easier to assume it's just the "liberal media" and a "moonbat conspiracy to discredit the president". (Funny thing about neocons and neocon-symps, they ALWAYS accuse the opposition of whatever it is THEY themselves are doing. They have taken over the MSM and still refer to it as a liberal dominated media, for example.)

But the dots have been connected, the photos and videos and interviewed firemen and statements from former employees of the Juggernaut...all the loose ends and questions they refuse to answer...it all adds up and causes severe cognitive dissonance. Truth movement folk need to be there to relieve that dissonance, but it has to be done correctly.

I wish that a dialogue on this could be opened in the community. How do we go about getting people away from the Giant Neocon Illusion Machine long enough to come out of denial on their own?

Plus, remember, there are some people who are genuinely frightened, more frightened even than myself, apparently: folks who fully believe LIHOP and/or MIHOP and yet are afraid to even open their mouths and express this to ANYONE let alone write it on the internet anywhere...because they are afraid they will be 'disappeared' and/or termed for it. What do we do about that? It's a valid concern, one I have chosen not to have; I have been a dissident half my life and it's already very obvious and that being the case there's nothing to be gained from my silence.

Like ACT-UP used to say as its slogan:

Silence = Death. I will not allow fear to shut me up. Life unfree is not worth living. So I choose not to have fear of speaking truth--but not TO power...I think it is time to speak power from truth, because speaking truth to power is moot when power ain't listenin' because it's too busy concocting the next lie.

6:04 AM  
Blogger Gabe said...

He's saved. He has a personal relationship with our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ (something clearly lacking from your soulless secular existences). King Mediocre Rich Kid actually believes that he's got heaven insurance, even after what he did on 9/11. But a saintly cripple on some remote jungle island isn't eligible to be there in paradise with him, because her tribe never had the good fortune of encountering missionaries.

This is no longer a valid worldview.

5:36 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

And Duhbya-appointing O'Connor said that this country is in danger of becoming a dictatorship, too

http://rawstory.com/news/2006/Retired_Supreme_Court_Justice_hits_attacks_0310.html

12:18 AM  
Blogger mary dwan said...

Please use names. When you say an official said or something like that, please use names. --or say that no name was given. ( I am talking about in your opinions, thegris, not the comments of others you quote.)
Thanks, Mary Dwan

9:22 PM  
Blogger mary dwan said...

did you jsut get my comment about using the names of people, thegris, not just an official or someone important.? I do not mean when you show other's comments on your site, but when you are making your own case.
Thanks, Mary Dwan, your faithful reader

9:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

None of this should be a surprise. The Spanish American War was started when we sabotaged our own ship, was it not? "Remember the Maine!"
I suspect that TWA 800 is and will be a mystery because the knowlegeable people are afraid of the FBI and the ridicule that is always aimed at disturbing truth truth tellers and whistle blowers.

6:29 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home