Why the Road to 9/11 Truth Passes Through London

Those in the 9/11 truth movement would gain tremendous leverage for our work by publicizing the truth behind the London subway bombings, and then driving home the similarities to 9/11.

Why? Because evidence is mounting that the London attacks may have been a "false flag" operation (as explained below):

For example, this short Fox news interview with terrorism expert and former prosecutor for the Justice Department shows that the bombing "mastermind" was a British intelligence agent (or read the transcript here); see confirming story here

This statement from a blast victim implies that bomb was beneath the train ("policeman said 'mind that hole, that's where the bomb was'. The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train....They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag").

Similiarly, this report from a Guardian reporter implies that the bomb was "under the carriage of a train", causing tiles to fly UPWARDS and the train to derail.

This summary discusses the terror drills occuring at the same time and place as the real attacks. The head of company running terror drills confirms the drills in this interview by ITN News and this interview by the Canadian Broadcast Corporation

This Reuters article shows that the bombs were of military origin and confirmed here

MSNBC translator confirms that claim of responsibility by Al-Qaeda was a fake; more on unreliability of message

This article raises the question of whether attackers were "arrested and then released" while remaining under close observation by the government".

And it is now come to light that the police were "bugging" the car of the mastermind of the bombings.

Israel was warned ahead of blasts, and confirmed here

Blair rejects investigation into bombing.

The parallels with 9/11 are striking. In both London and America, "terror drills" occurred at the same time as the real attacks. In both incidences, the attacks involved explosions whose nature and scope indicated coordination beyond the reach of a handful of lone, deranged terrorists. Each time, security cameras which should have filmed the actual events were mysteriously nonfunctional. The alleged perpetrators of both attacks appear to have been under very close observation by the respective intelligence services. Both times, documents of the alleged terrorists were conveniently found on the scene under suspicious circumstances. And the leader of each victim country tried to stop any real investigation.

Indeed, a former British MI5 intelligence agent says there are "many similarities" between the London bombings and 9/11; and see discussion of 9/11 for comparison.

But why is this so important? Because the London attacks are so recent that the disinformation specialists have not yet had time to bury the truth. The attacks are still in the early stages of "investigation", and are fresh in people's minds. And perhaps most importantly -- because they have occurred on another continent -- Americans may examine this barbaric act of deception with more open eyes and minds than they have previously done concerning the traumatizing attack in their own country.

Hundreds of years ago, ships would raise an enemy's flag and then attack one of their own countryman's ships . . . and then blamed the attack on the enemy. This gave an excuse to declare war on the enemy. Thus was born the phrase "false flag" attack.

If we push the truth that the London attacks may have been a "false flag" operation, and link that to 9/11, we have a powerful opportunity to wake people up. Once people grasp the reality of the London attacks, it is a short step to having them reexamine the facts regarding 9/11.

George.