Tuesday, May 16, 2006

I Don't Know, But ...

Now that the new videos of the impact with the Pentagon are getting airplay in all of the mainstream media, what should we do?

Well, Flight77.info, one of the groups which fought for release of the Pentagon tapes, says "we still have a second FOIA [which stands for "freedom of information act"] request active for the other 84 flight 77 recordings. We WILL get those also. They should include the Citgo [gas station] tape and the [Sheraton] hotel tape." So there will probably be more videos coming.

Dylan Avery argues that the new tapes prove that flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon. Alex Jones argues that the new videos are setting the "no planers" up in order to discredit the entire 9/11 movement.

So who's right?

I don't know. I've always been agnostic about what hit the Pentagon, and still am.

But what I do know is how we should leverage this media focus on 9/11. This is a golden opportunity to focus on what we do know.

Whenever anyone asks me "Don't these videos prove that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon?" I'm going to respond like this:

"I don't know. But I do know that the world's mightiest military was stood down on 9/11, fighter jets flew at only a small fraction of their top speed, and planes were allowed to fly all over the country for an hour or so, according to people like the former head of the Star Wars space defense system, a retired air force colonel who flew more than 100 combat missions.

And I know that there were 5 war games that "happened" to be occurring on the morning of 9/11, including one simulating a plane crashing into a building, and that Dick Cheney was apparently in charge of the war games and all counter-terrorism activities on 9/11, and that he appears to have allowed the Pentagon to be hit, according to testimony by Secretary of Transportation Norm Minetta to the 9/11 Commission.

And I know that physicists, mechanical engineers, and other scientists have said that the world trade centers were intentionally destroyed with controlled demolition. Indeed, they point out that a third building -- world trade center 7 -- was destroyed on 9/11 even though it was never hit by a plane, had only small fires, and collapsed at the same speed as if it had no supports or walls whatsoever.

And I know that the 9/11 Commission was a political whitewash which didn't address the most important issues regarding what happened on 9/11, according to folks like the former head of the FBI.

And I know that it is well-documented that many governments around the world, including the U.S., have faked terrorist attacks against their own people and blamed it on enemies in order to justify wars against those enemies, according to very credible historians.

Wanna talk about these things?


Anonymous Anonymous said...

i personally couldn't give a shit what hit it, it's a side issue

if it was a missile ... who fired it?

if it was a plane ... who was flying it?

who pressed the button to demolish the towers?

who was in the chopper overseeing it?

6:10 PM  
Anonymous R Duray 9/11 Truth Alliance said...

Consider that the "evidence" provided by the latest FOIA demanded surveillance recordings is simply too ambiguous for any intelligent person to decipher. Further, consider that surveillance cameras were installed on the parapets of the Pentagon and on adjacent buildings. The mere fact that we have not been provided with this data should indicate to any thinking person that there is still much disturbing information that the government is choosing to hide regarding the attack on the Pentagon.

1:28 AM  
Blogger Phantom Lord said...

All this new video proves is that those other videos need to be released to put this issue to bed once and for all.

The gas station video supposedly has a direct view and shows the plane come in.

What's the harm with releasing that?
What about the hotel or DOT Video's?

To say its in the interest of National Security to keep those videos from the public is a load of crap.

2:22 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who gives a fuck what alex jones or dylan avery says. They both use fake photos and footage to promote their own crapola.

The video says there was NO Boeing 767.

2:34 AM  
Blogger dylan avery said...

hey anonymous, not a single thing in my movie is fake.
do your research. i didnt tell george to post what I thought.
my opinion on this matter isn't relevant, so leave personal attacks out of this.

6:38 AM  
Blogger Pissedoffcabbie said...

It's a shame that the bulk of discussion on 9/11 complicity has centered around what hit the pentagon, and what made the towers fall. It's an endless debate that keeps us away from the real smoking guns, like WTC 7, the NORAD stand-down, the put-options, etc.

It matters not what hit those buildings. If I were an attorney, that would be the last thing that I would bring into the case, if at all.

If the discussion does not move out of this cul-de-sac, then it will never get to the next level of awareness, and it will eventually die out as an issue. Nice work, spinmeisters.

12:00 AM  
Blogger Andrew Lowe-Watson said...

I am a little alarmed that a few prominent 'truthers' , led by the much praised John Albanese, are casting doubt on the validity of Jones and Griffin's research by implication. Is this helpful?

2:56 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home