Hostile Takeover of Scholars for 9/11 Truth
Without naming names at this point, people hostile to rationality and the scientific method are close to completely taking over Scholars for 9/11 Truth. Such people claim that "space beams" destroyed the World Trade Center, that no planes hit the Twin Towers, and that the Twin Towers fell faster than free-fall speed. None of the scientists in the Scholars' group buy these theories.
These people throw out false arguments and then -- when caught in an untruth -- start calling anyone who raises contrary facts names and attempts to bully them into submission. They used the Karl Rove "slime and defend" tactics. Even though all of the group's scientists disclaim these claims, the Rovians shout them from the rooftops on websites and radio broadcasts and every other soapbox they can find.
One of the Twin Cities largest papers is covering the story, and Jeff Wells of Rigourous Intuition says "scholars for 9/11 Truth [are] tearing one another new impact holes over speculation on space-based beam weaponry."
Will cloudy thinkers and disinformation agents win? Or will rationality prevail?
Even though the Scholars' group includes stellar scientists, and heroes like Bob Bowman, David Ray Griffin, and many others, everyone will need to ignore the group if the hostile takeover is completed. If the ship sinks, the good people will find better homes, because you cannot keep good men (or women) down.
These people throw out false arguments and then -- when caught in an untruth -- start calling anyone who raises contrary facts names and attempts to bully them into submission. They used the Karl Rove "slime and defend" tactics. Even though all of the group's scientists disclaim these claims, the Rovians shout them from the rooftops on websites and radio broadcasts and every other soapbox they can find.
One of the Twin Cities largest papers is covering the story, and Jeff Wells of Rigourous Intuition says "scholars for 9/11 Truth [are] tearing one another new impact holes over speculation on space-based beam weaponry."
Will cloudy thinkers and disinformation agents win? Or will rationality prevail?
Even though the Scholars' group includes stellar scientists, and heroes like Bob Bowman, David Ray Griffin, and many others, everyone will need to ignore the group if the hostile takeover is completed. If the ship sinks, the good people will find better homes, because you cannot keep good men (or women) down.
9 Comments:
Bizarre! E.Q.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
who said...
Perhaps before ridiculing and dismissing the theory that DEWs may have been utilized to destroy the World Trade Center, you should take the time to actually read the theory.
You can find it here: http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam1.html
10:11 PM
people hostile to rationality and the scientific method are close to completely taking over Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
Uhhhh... that describes the people who FOUNDED Scholars for Al-Queada, you moron.
Some fat, toothless, child raping, Osama loving piece of @#$% deleted my last post because he can't handle the TRUTH™.
Hey Al-Queada sympathizers... when the war is over. There's gonna be some scores to settle on the home front... if you catch my drift.
Get a life Mormon Jihad! 16 of the 19 terrorists got their visas through Jeddah. Former visa section head there, Michael Springmann, has no problem with the idea that those 19 terrorists came into the US as part of a general program run by the CIA to uncritically allow jihadists into the US, usually for terrorist training. Perhaps you could do some homework on Ali Mohammed. I mean, if you're going to go after all the al Qaeda lovers, you'll have to take on some US Rangers. Good luck with that one pal.
Clearly there is more than enough conventional demolition technology right here at home to fake the destruction of the Twin Towers without having to fantasize about energy beams from outer space.
This comment has been removed by the author.
I can provide first-hand witness testimony that Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice aren't.
Ideological Bigotry on the Internet
Post a Comment
<< Home