Monday, October 17, 2005

America Cannot Survive Another False Flag Attack

False flag terror -- that is, state-sponsored terrorism, blamed on the "bad guys" of choice -- is getting unprecedented coverage from current and former government employees and mainstream news sources:

On Monday, a retired 27-year CIA analyst who prepared and presented Presidential Daily Briefs and served as a high-level analyst for several presidents, stated that if there was another major attack in the U.S., it would lead to martial law. He went on to say:

"We have to be careful, if somebody does this kind of provocation, big violent explosions of some kind, we have to not take the word of the masters there in Washington that this was some terrorist event because it could well be a provocation allowing them, or seemingly to allow them to get what they want."

The former CIA analyst would not put it past the government to "play fast and loose" with terror alerts and warnings and even events themselves in order to rally people behind the flag

On October 12, 2005, Australia's largest newspaper quoted the well-respected former Indonesian president as saying that the government had a role in the Bali bombings

On the same day, newsman Keith Olbermann listed numerous instances in which the administration had issued terror alerts based on scant intelligence in order to rally people around the flag when the administration was suffering in the polls, which is a step towards acknowledging that the "war on terror" is not what the government claims it is

On October 11th, current U.S. Congressman Ron Paul stated that the government "is determined to have martial law", and that the government is hoping to get the people "fearful enough that they will accept the man on the white horse"

Last month, a member of Parliament stated that "there is a very real danger" that the American government will stage a false flag terror attack in order to justify war against Iran and to gain complete control domestically

And Americans dressed as Arabs have apparently been setting off car bombs in Iraq (apparently, when it was discovered that some of the cars used in Iraqi bombings recently came from the U.S., the cover story became American cars were involved in car bombings only because they had recently beenstolen from the U.S. and then shipped to Iraq -- but does it make senes that Iraqi insurgents would steal cars in the U.S. and ship them all the way to Iraq?)

Similarly, Britain's false flag attacks in Basra made the news in September. And the press has acknowledged that the death of the lead investigator into the Basra incident was mysterious, which may keep the Basra story alive even longer.

The investigation and potential indictments regarding the CIA leak scandal are important, especially if they widen to include the administration's intentional lies to get us into war.

But the growing discussion of false flag operations by the U.S. and its allies is at least as important. Indeed, if indictments or articles of impeachment are issued against top officials, a false flag attack would cause a suspension of the constitution in whole or in part, in which case such criminal and impeachment proceedings would likely be suspended. Therefore, whether or not Patrick Fitzgerald issues indictments, and whether or not Bush, Cheney and the gang are indicted or impeached, the need to spread the truth about false flag operations has never been greater; perhaps, given the recent statements on this issue, the opportunity has never been greater.

Please pressure Congress, the media, and those who don't have internet access to learn about this issue. It is literally now or never.

America cannot survive another false flag attack.

Postscript: the Former UN Weapons Inspector who stated before the Iraq war started that there were no weapons of mass destruction is now saying that he would not rule out staged government terror by the U.S. government. And Daniel Ellsberg, the famous Pentagon Papers whistleblower, is now saying the same thing. Moreover, a GOP memo allegedly touts a new terror attack as a way to reverse the party's decline.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi George, It has been a great pleasure to visit your site. Talking about false flags, this link leads to a paper on the Israeli story to justify war crimes in Lebanon, which has been as you surely know strongly supported by the US goverment.

So, yes, as you say, this is getting pretty dangerous... even more now that their offspring is practicing its own national-scale massacres. What to do, what to do?

2:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

great post man.

it's too late, though.

they've obviously got all the plans in full swing, and we're completely fucked. only a matter of time now...

10:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Last month, a member of Parliament stated that "there is a very real danger" that the American government will stage a false flag terror attack in order to justify war against Iran and to gain complete control domestically"


Seems to me George is probably running his own false flag op. I didn't recall we had a Parliament here in America.


Don't worry George, those of us who actually are Americans and patriots won't sit still if the government tries to seize totalitarian control of the country.

5:21 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

An in depth investigation of the administrations participation in the 9/11 event has got to take place. There are more than enough questions to justify in depth hearings.

There are far too many people in this country who would keep this corrupt government alive to protect the reputations of past leaders and patriots. True patriots and honorable leaders will allways have an honored place in history, long after an obsolete and corrupted system has passed from memory.

10:09 AM  



11:16 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home