Monday, July 17, 2006

Officials from Across the Political Spectrum Question 9/11

The following table shows that high-ranking officials from across the political spectrum question the official version of 9/11:


Current Republican Congressman states that "we see the [9/11] investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on"

Former U.S. Republican Congressman, who is a senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and who served six years as Chairman of the Military Research and Development Subcommittee (see also this statement, and this one)

Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan (his conservative credentials are evident in his bio)

Former high-ranking official under George W. Bush, and former director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis

Former high-ranking official under Ronald Reagan, who is a highly influential conservative (see also this essay)

Former Air Force Colonel and Pentagon official, who was part of the influential Office of Special Plans, and who was at the Pentagon on 9/11


Current U.S. Senator states "The two questions that the congress will not ask . . . is why did 9/11 happen on George Bush's watch when he had clear warnings that it was going to happen? Why did they allow it to happen?"

Former director of the U.S. "Star Wars" space defense program in both Republican and Democratic administrations, who was a senior air force colonel who flew 101 combat missions (see also this statement)

Former ambassador to Iraq Joseph Wilson

Current congresswoman, former senior CIA analyst, former Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning under Nixon, Ford, and Carter, former US Ambassador and Chief of Mission to Iraq, former Deputy Director to the White House Task Force on Terrorism, and former US Department of State Foreign Service Officer (as well as a who's who of liberals and independents)

Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg


Former Two-Star general

Former 20-year Marine Corps infantry and intelligence officer, the second-ranking civilian in U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence, and former CIA clandestine services case officer stated that "9/11 was at a minimum allowed to happen as a pretext for war", and it was probably an inside job (see Customer Review dated October 7, 2006).

Former FBI translator, who the Department of Justice's Inspector General and several senators have called extremely credible (free subscription required), said "If they were to do real investigations we would see several significant high level criminal prosecutions in this country. And that is something that they are not going to let out. And, believe me; they will do everything to cover this up". She also is leaning towards the conclusion that 9/11 was an inside job

Former Canadian Minister of Defense

Two former MI5 (British intelligence) agents (19 minutes into video)

High-ranking general and the former chief of NATO (in Danish; hint -- he mentions bombs in the Twin Towers)

The commander-in-chief of the Russian Air Force; and see also statement of former chief of staff of the Russian armed forces

See also the officials listed here and here.

These are just the officials who have gone public. There are many more who have privately expressed skepticism of the official story.

I am not vouching for everything that these officials state, or for the credibility of every official. But this list shows, without doubt, that the demand for 9/11 truth is bipartisan.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

pnac -is also biipartisan-as is the Council on Foreign Relations, the Center for Strategic and International Affairs, and the Institute for International Economics.

Which means what?

Thats there'san a bipartisan effort to support the 911 Inside Job idea-Now on Hannity-FOX,. WBAI-pacifica, WLIB-randy rhodes, so on.

Its mainstream by now

Dont be manipulated, read:

9:25 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What happened to Stanley Hilton?

2:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi, I suggest two members of the european parliament:
Paul Lannoye (Belgium look atù
and Giulietto Chiesa (Italian, if you understand italian: )

5:04 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9/11 was the beginning. This Israel-Arab war is a side show for the main event. While Israel attacks her neighbors, the US gov't erodes our rights at home by stealing private land, forcing Amazon to drop the book "America Deceived" by E.A. Blayre III and wire-tapping ALL phones without a warrant. Soon, the US will attack Iran and throw the entire Middle East into chaos. Add in a false-flag attack on the US (like 9/11) and the public will beg for One World Gov't.
Support indy media.
Be defiant, last link (before Google Books caves in to pressure ans drops the book):

2:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey , if they got away with it the first time.......

Cheney is starting to see iron bars, so you better hold on tight, cause I bet it's gonna be a fun ride for ya'll.

America the great, seems to be having a little trouble in the Mid-East lately? Even Israel isn't listening to you anymore. They're going to keep lobbing shells on beaches and cities (signed and sealed by smiling-happy-little Israeli girls), so while they draw pictures on ammo purchased from America , you are all forced to sit on your hands. The stupid 'tail wagging the mutt', whatever. It doesn't look good on you.

If Israel won't listen to you, then nobody will. Why should they anyway. Pretty Pathetic.

Billy G.

3:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Since the Feds were allowed to get away with the murder of JFK, perhaps the US public deserves what they’re getting and going to get. 9-11 even with all its horror is not as ugly as the public’s acceptance of the “official” story. If the public can so easily be deterred from the truth than what’s to stop their eventual enslavement. 9-11 is not a mystery. What may be a mystery is how all this power to corrupt started. Well here it is:

6:00 PM  
Blogger Avery Dylan said...

Like, hey man, I mean they got your phone too?

4:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Shouldn't you be changing the name of this blog to "Benedict Arnold"?

5:28 PM  
Blogger High Power Rocketry said...

: )

7:29 PM  
Blogger Avery Dylan said...

Dylan, is that you?

7:33 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home