Saturday, June 03, 2006

Highly Credible People Question 9/11

Before you can come to an informed decision about 9/11, you should read why the following HIGHLY CREDIBLE people question the government's story about 9/11:

Military leaders

Legal scholars

Structural engineers


Members of Congress

9/11 Commissioners

Psychiatrists and psychologists


Victims' family members and heroic first responders

Prominent liberals

Prominent conservatives


Jews and Muslims

Pilots and air traffic controllers

If you haven't heard of all of these credible people, here's why.

For a plain text version of this list, click here.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can leave the "inside job" stuff and charges in the buildings and Building 7 and what really hit the Pentagon questions to others, and simply ask the following "realistic" questions:

1. Where were our country's air defenses on 9/11? We pay half our taxes for defense, so where was it? Can we get refunds? How can a plane strike the friggin' Pentagon without being fired upon and blown to bits over the lawn? Why when the first tower was struck and the plane that would strike the second tower went wildly off course, were military planes not scrambled as is or should be normal procedure?

2. Why was the President of the United States allowed to sit relatively exposed in a schoolroom while it was known that the country was under attack? Why did he just sit there while the country was obviously under attack and he was told so? Why didn't his handlers remove him?

5:57 PM  
Blogger 911truthdotorg said...

I think I can answer these two questions for you:

1. In June 2001, the control of NORAD, our air defense system, was taken away from the Air Force Generals at NORAD and given to cheney. This had never happened since NORAD was created in the early 60's.
On 9/11, Norman Mineta testified to the 9/11 Commission that cheney repeatedly told an officer that "the orders still stand" - presumably NOT to shoot down whatever hit the Pentagon. It could not have been a 757. Here's his testimony on You Tube:

2. My theory as to why bush was allowed to stay in the classroom had to be because they KNEW he was in no danger. bush has said publicly that he saw the first plane hit the first tower on a TV outside the classroom. Unless he had a closed circuit TV he could not have seen it because there was no live network coverage of the first tower being hit. And if there was a CCTV, he is as guilty as sin because that means he knew it was going to happen. A new ABC video clip has recently been released where the reporters asked bush if he knew what was going on in NYC as he was leaving his hotel that morning! So, either way he is lying through his teeth! Here's the video:

I hope this answers your questions!

8:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Using anonymous because I don't have a web page.
OK. I am sure as the sun rises in the east and sets in the west that at the very least 9/11 was allowed to happen. What I would like clarified is:
a)Were 4 planes hijacked that day?
b)If even one was not use as in the Pentagon hit, where did that plane go? Was radar following it and where does it show it disappeared from the screen?

4:05 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am none of the above but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know, if they have done some research on this, to know the dots don't fit!!! Everything that has happened that day and since points to 911 being an inside job. Period.
1. Bush didn't want a 9/11 commission and stacked it with his cronies.
2. Bush hasn't funded homeland security because he knows there is no reason.
3. The remains were quickly taken away and not investigated as is ALWAYS the case in cases like this.
4. TV News said one thing that day and later in the week things would be totally different. I kept trying to tell myself not to think about those things but there were just too many issues let out that day and they were trying to backtrack or coverup.
5. They didn't have a clue but they could crack the case entirely in 2-3 days?
6. It takes months to ready the troops for war but in a month we went to war?
7. The Patriot Act was already written before 911.
8. Marvin Bush was head of security of the twin towers. Hello!!!
9. Why have we not seen ANY real proof of what they've told us? We are just to take it on faith that they are telling us the truth? Just like all the other lies before from govt.?
10. Plus all the other issues many others have brought out.

If anyone put some research into it they would have to come up with the same conclusion. IMO.

10:33 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The policy change document is here:

Many people on the web seem to think that this policy change bottlenecks military responses
to apparent civil airplane hijackings by making such responses newly (in 2001)
dependent on the notification and approval of the Secretary of Defense

The relevant section of this document is quoted here:

4. Policy.
a. Aircraft Piracy (Hijacking) of Civil and Military Aircraft. Pursuant
to references a and b, the Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA), has exclusive responsibility to direct law enforcement activity
related to actual or attempted aircraft piracy (hijacking) in the "special
aircraft jurisdiction" of the United States. When requested by the
Administrator, Department of Defense will provide assistance to these
law enforcement efforts. Pursuant to reference c, the NMCC is the focal
point within Department of Defense for providing assistance. In the
event of a hijacking, the NMCC will be notified by the most expeditious
means by the FAA. The NMCC will, with the exception of immediate
responses as authorized by reference d, forward requests for DOD
assistance to the Secretary of Defense for approval. DOD assistance to
the FAA will be provided in accordance with reference d. Additional
guidance is provided in Enclosure A.

It looks to me as though this policy explicity DOES NOT apply to
"immediate response" situation such as 9/11 since it says:

"The NMCC will, with the exception of immediate responses as
authorized by reference d, forward requests..."

And "reference d" is:

DOD Directive 3025.15, 18 February 1997, "Military Assistance to Civil
Authorities" (
This document is obviously much older and obviously allows immediate
responses without such a bottleneck (since this bottleneck is added
for all non-emergency responses by the 2001 policy change):

4.7.1. Immediate Response. Requests for an immediate response (i.e., any
form of immediate action taken by a DoD Component or military commander to save
lives, prevent human suffering, or mitigate great property damage
under imminently
serious conditions) may be made to any Component or Command. The DoD
Components that receive verbal requests from civil authorities for
support in an exigent
emergency may initiate informal planning and, if required, immediately
respond as
authorized in DoD Directive 3025.1 (reference (g)). Civil authorities shall be
informed that verbal requests for support in an emergency must be
followed by a written
request. As soon as practical, the DoD Component or Command rendering assistance
shall report the fact of the request, the nature of the response, and
any other pertinent
information through the chain of command to the DoD Executive
Secretary, who shall
notify the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff, and any other
appropriate officials. If the report does not include a copy of the
civil authorities'
written request, that request shall be forwarded to the DoD Executive
Secretary as soon
as it is available.

12:41 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

If 9/11 was an inside job, that means we've been lied to continuously for six years, the war on terror is just a sham to consolidate power, and our biggest enemies are in the highest offices in the land. But who cares about that, let's watch some reality Tv!!!

12:55 PM  
Blogger Margarita said...

OK right blog this time
Newbie here with a brother's comment to be scrtinized and commented on
That was an interesting Blog. Now I've gotta admit that the conspiracy stuff is very compelling but you have to read both sides.
To rant some more: each one of those planes had 6,000 US gallons of highly volatile aviation fuel onboard. When they hit at about 475 MPH the fuel started to burn and much of it traveled down the expansive WTC central elevator shafts shooting out elevator doors on the way down. This accounts for what looked like controlled explosions on lower floors. Even the Loose Change guys admitted that they are taking the controlled demolition theories out of their next updated version (They are also removing the WTC bldg 7 theories out).
Number one in my mind, though, is that no matter all the theories and denials Bin Laden admitted that they planned it and carried it out and so did his #2 :Zarqawi, You can't get beyond those Islamist Butt Heads. As big an asshole George Bush is, they are bigger and have had as much or more $$$ to work with and have way more now. They don't need Senate approval for anything. And just like in the 1960 &1970s with Ho Chi Minh they have the sympathy of the world's USA govt haters. The US govt is just basically inept. Too inept to even get water to the Superdome for five days after Katrina!
My theory about the Iraq invasion is that Bush had a grudge against Hussein since 1992 when Saddam sent agents into Kuwait to assasinate his dad (then President) and his wife Laura who participated in a Gulf War victory parade. The attempt failed but Jr vowed revenge. Simple as that. Add Cheney and Haliburton to the mix and you have total naive idiotic, shameful disaster
Pant, pant rave, rave,sorry. I just think that people just want a conspiracy to be true. If Americans would just expend as much energy VOTING

3:00 AM  
Blogger Ken Depledge said...

We need to call for a "We the People 9/11 investigation".. Congress is going to do nothing... There are some very credible people out there that believe as we do.. Let's get together..We could have it in place by mid-summer.. The administration will have to appear or be guilty by proxy.. We will make every newspaper aware of time, place and agenda...There are honest Americans that want truth, the money will come in to bring it about..We need to act, no one is going to act for us.If we wait, the lies will continue and this administration and the next will continue to build on them. only the TRUTH will bring this great nation back to a government of by and for the people..let's act now
Ken depledge--12310 Route 394--Randolph,NY 14772 716-358-5882

7:38 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home